Wednesday, December 10, 2003
  Far be it from me to defend Michael Jackson, the man is weird and has made himself a public spectacle, but we've already convicted him of something he may not have actually done. I would like to be the first to flip the switch on the guy if he's guilty, but what if we are hounding and destroying the reputation (not to mention the livelihood) of an innocent man? Who becomes the monster then?

I realize that there have been several allegations but is the amount of cases directly in proportion to the truth of those cases? One would think that it would be easier to accuse someone who's already been accused.

Regardless, we will have to live with the consequences of our actions for many years to come. Hooray for us for stopping him if he is what we think he is. God help us if he is not.

Comments: Post a Comment